diff --git a/suggestions.html b/suggestions.html
index 637a4fc776f4a69538e9313bdc1bc9965a95ced9..bbbe6391723fadc19b4c32e8dca9d3e96bca83eb 100644
--- a/suggestions.html
+++ b/suggestions.html
@@ -42,15 +42,15 @@ The paper must be in the same format as in the final published proceedings, i.e.
 
 <h4>My paper does not fit within the page limit. Can I leave proofs and other details out in a appendix?</h4>
 
-The general idea is that the submitted version of your paper must contain the same amount of information that, in case of acceptance, will go in the final proceedings. Therefore, if you have additional material that you want to make available to the reviewers, but that will not go into the final proceedings, then you must:
+The general idea is that the submitted version of your paper must contain the same amount of information that, in case of acceptance, will go in the final proceedings.  The paper must be self-contained, but an appendix with supplementary material of up to 2 pages is permitted.  Papers exceeding the page limit will not be reviewed.  If you have additional material that you want to make available to the reviewers that will not fit in the appendix, but that will not go into the final proceedings, then you must:
 
 <ul>
 <li>Write a technical report, that can be of any length and any format, containing the additional material;</li>
 <li>Make the tech report available on your web page or in a web site of your institution;</li>
-<li>When you submit the paper, you must submit also the tech report, so that we can make it available to the reviewers (this is to enforce anonymity of the reviewers).</li>
+<li>A paper that requires a technical report for further explanation should reference the technical report in the paper so that the reviewer knows where to find it.</li>
 </ul>
 
-Notice that the additional material in the technical report will not be published in the proceedings. Therefore, you are completely free to submit it to some journal or conference. As a final note, remember that reviewers must evaluate your paper and not the technical report. If reviewers think the paper contains insufficient material to be published, then the paper might be rejected, regardless of the contents of the technical report.  Please note that reviewers are not obligated to read material beyond the ten-page limit; additional material in a technical report may or may not be examined.<br><br>
+Notice that the additional material in the technical report will not be published in the proceedings. Therefore, you are completely free to submit it to some journal or conference. As a final note, remember that reviewers must evaluate your paper and not the appendix or the technical report. If reviewers think the paper contains insufficient material to be published, then the paper might be rejected, regardless of the contents of the appendix or technical report. Please note that reviewers are not obligated to read material beyond the ten-page limit; additional material in the appendix or a technical report may or may not be examined.<br><br>
 
 <h4><span class="purpleishtag">Originality</span></h4>