From c9ed29d47e8500689c3ad5617569fba54707174a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martina Maggio <maggio.martina@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:00:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] first 10page draft
---
paper/sections/00-header.tex | 16 +++++------
paper/sections/06-results.tex | 52 +++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/paper/sections/00-header.tex b/paper/sections/00-header.tex
index 53987d2..9a0d449 100644
--- a/paper/sections/00-header.tex
+++ b/paper/sections/00-header.tex
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
% bad trick
-\linespread{0.9998}
+%\linespread{0.98}
%reduce space around equations
\makeatletter
\g@addto@macro\normalsize{%
- \setlength\abovedisplayskip{3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
- \setlength\belowdisplayskip{3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
- \setlength\abovedisplayshortskip{3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
- \setlength\belowdisplayshortskip{3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
+ \setlength\abovedisplayskip{5pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
+ \setlength\belowdisplayskip{5pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
+ \setlength\abovedisplayshortskip{5pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
+ \setlength\belowdisplayshortskip{5pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}
}
\makeatother
% options for pics
-\setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{1pt plus 1pt minus 2pt} %0pt plus
-\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{1pt plus 1pt minus 10pt} %0pt plus
-\setlength{\textfloatsep}{1pt plus 1pt minus 2pt} %2pt plus
+\setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{2pt plus 2pt minus 2pt} %0pt plus
+\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{2pt plus 2pt minus 10pt} %0pt plus
+\setlength{\textfloatsep}{2pt plus 2pt minus 2pt} %2pt plus
\setlength{\dbltextfloatsep}{10pt plus 0pt minus 0pt} %2pt plus
% reducing space around section headings
diff --git a/paper/sections/06-results.tex b/paper/sections/06-results.tex
index 3bdf286..b047e4b 100644
--- a/paper/sections/06-results.tex
+++ b/paper/sections/06-results.tex
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
\begin{groupplot}[%
group style = {group size = 1 by 2, vertical sep = 0.2cm,
xlabels at=edge bottom,xticklabels at=edge bottom,},
- height = 3cm,
+ height = 2.5cm,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.9\columnwidth,
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ experiment with the accuracy-battery trade-off.
\begin{groupplot}[%
group style = {group size = 1 by 2, vertical sep = 0.2cm,
xlabels at=edge bottom,xticklabels at=edge bottom,},
- height = 3cm,
+ height = 2.5cm,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.9\columnwidth,
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ experiment with the accuracy-battery trade-off.
\begin{groupplot}[%
group style = {group size = 1 by 3, vertical sep = 0.2cm,
xlabels at=edge bottom,xticklabels at=edge bottom,},
- height = 3cm,
+ height = 2.5cm,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.9\columnwidth,
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ independently capture the tracking of individual satellites.
\begin{minipage}{0.95\columnwidth}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[%
- height = 0.8\textwidth,
+ height = 0.7\textwidth,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.95\textwidth,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ independently capture the tracking of individual satellites.
\vspace{-2mm}
\begin{tikzpicture}[spy using outlines={rounded rectangle, width=3.5cm, height=3.5cm, magnification=2.5, connect spies}]
\begin{axis}[%
- height = 0.8\textwidth,
+ height = 0.7\textwidth,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.95\textwidth,
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ independently capture the tracking of individual satellites.
\begin{minipage}{0.95\columnwidth}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[%
- height = 0.6\textwidth,
+ height = 0.55\textwidth,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.95\textwidth,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ independently capture the tracking of individual satellites.
\vspace{1.1cm}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[%
- height = 0.6\textwidth,
+ height = 0.55\textwidth,
grid style = {black!30, dashed},
grid = major,
width = 0.95\textwidth,
@@ -414,25 +414,6 @@ root-mean-square of the distance between the trace and the pure GPS
signal. We also normalize (removing the minimum number encountered in
the simulations), to highlight the trade-off.
-Figure~\ref{fig:bike-tradeoff} shows the simulation results for the
-cycling tracking. Different colors for the marks correspond to
-different threshold values. The figure highlights the trade-off and
-show that it is controllable using the choice of the threshold.
-Furthermore two other interesting phenomena are pointed out by this
-simulation. First, for low triggering values (blue, red, and green
-points) the variance of the error is lower, since the simulation is
-converging to always-on scenario, saturating the achievable tracking
-precision. At the same time, the energy consumption variance
-increases due to frequent changes in sensor state (with the receiver
-being affected by the time it takes to fetch satellites' signals).
-Second, higher triggering values instead (purple, yellow, and orange
-points) the opposite behavior is experienced. The variance in terms
-of energy consumption is smaller, since the antenna is turned on less
-frequently (implying that there will be less uncertainty on the time
-spent fetching satellites' signals). The error here becomes lager and
-with higher variance, due to the need to exploit more often (less
-reliable) IMU data.
-
\begin{figure*}
\begin{minipage}{0.95\columnwidth}
\begin{tikzpicture}
@@ -521,6 +502,25 @@ value.}
\label{fig:car-tradeoff}
\end{minipage}
\end{figure*}
+%
+Figure~\ref{fig:bike-tradeoff} shows the simulation results for the
+cycling tracking. Different colors for the marks correspond to
+different threshold values. The figure highlights the trade-off and
+show that it is controllable using the choice of the threshold.
+Furthermore two other interesting phenomena are pointed out by this
+simulation. First, for low triggering values (blue, red, and green
+points) the variance of the error is lower, since the simulation is
+converging to always-on scenario, saturating the achievable tracking
+precision. At the same time, the energy consumption variance
+increases due to frequent changes in sensor state (with the receiver
+being affected by the time it takes to fetch satellites' signals).
+Second, higher triggering values instead (purple, yellow, and orange
+points) the opposite behavior is experienced. The variance in terms
+of energy consumption is smaller, since the antenna is turned on less
+frequently (implying that there will be less uncertainty on the time
+spent fetching satellites' signals). The error here becomes lager and
+with higher variance, due to the need to exploit more often (less
+reliable) IMU data.
Finally, Figure~\ref{fig:car-tradeoff} shows the simulations
performed using the car data. Given the introduction of a varying
--
GitLab